The one thing I don’t really like about Quantum is the browser’s diminished UI gradients, as shown in the image above. I have never liked Microsoft’s decision to embrace a gradient-free future; it makes it harder to navigate options, not easier. It’s one reason I have no plans to upgrade to later versions of Office (that, and Office 2010 works perfectly for what I need it for). We intended to have our own benchmark suite to show, but my attempts to run some tests on my own system ran into snags. Firefox refused to differentiate properly between two different versions of the browser, even when we consulted guides on dual-browser setup. Our sister site, PCMag, had better luck: Here’s what it reported for overall performance:
On the Speedometer benchmark, the pre-Quantum Firefox release scored 45, compared with 70 for Firefox Quantum. JetStream is one of the most thorough JavaScript benchmarks around, incorporating tests from Google’s Octane and the WebKit Sunspider benchmark. Firefox Quantum scored 151 on JetStream compared with 144 for Google Chrome. Our own initial tests on Quantum confirm that it feels snappier, though perhaps not as much as we’d have seen under different circumstances. I deleted my old Firefox profile a few months back and created a new one, in an attempt to troubleshoot some problems I was having. It actually worked wonders for the browser’s overall performance level, but that means I’m not seeing much in the way of big gains at the moment. Still, Quantum seems to be a step forward for the Mozilla Foundation and Firefox itself. Hopefully that momentum will translate into increased market share and better competition for Chrome.
No comments:
Post a Comment